Hi Cecilia,
It is wonderful to see how thoughtfully you approach the use of AI in education and instructional design. I especially appreciated your emphasis on the importance of human mediation and careful planning when integrating AI into teaching and learning. Your point about avoiding passive learning experiences is very important because meaningful learning still depends on active student engagement, critical thinking, and the guidance of educators.
Your perspective on AI as a collaborator rather than a replacement for educators also stands out. You explained very clearly how AI can support instructional designers by helping with repetitive tasks and allowing more time for deeper thinking about pedagogy and teaching strategies. This balanced approach reflects a strong understanding of how technology can enhance education when used responsibly and intentionally.
The article you selected is highly relevant to your discussion. I like how you connected the idea of “human in the loop” to your own professional experience and beliefs about teaching and learning. The focus on teacher preparedness, training, and thoughtful implementation is essential, especially as educators continue exploring different ways to use generative AI effectively in K–12 and beyond.
You also raised an important point about the differences in AI adoption among colleagues. Why do you think some educators are still hesitant to explore AI tools in their teaching practice? In your experience as an instructional designer, what kinds of professional development or support help educators feel more confident using AI meaningfully?