Artificial Intelligence in K12

Artificial Intelligence in K12

by Cecilia Fernandez -
Number of replies: 1

Using AI for Instruction and learning: AI can be a useful tool for instruction and learning, as long as there is a careful plan mediated by humans. The classes, the materials and the evaluation have to be design to avoid situations were the student is passive and the AI does the work.

AI for course development: As an Instructional Designer, the AI has become a important tool in my work. I use it as a collaborator, to help me develop ideas faster. AI is an excellent “assistant”, to work on repetitive and routine tasks and liberating time for us to think deeper about teaching strategies.

Some of my colleagues use AI for everything, other have not tried it yet. 


This is the selected article:
Integrating generative artificial intelligence in K-12 education: Examining teachers’             preparedness, practices, and barriers
Cheah, Y. H., Lu, J., & Kim, J. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence in K-12 education: Examining teachers’ preparedness, practices, and barriers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100363

This article fits my perspective about the importance of the human intervention in any instructional or learning experiencia. It talks about “human in the loop”, mentions that how we use the technology is more important that the tools used, and emphasizes teacher training needs.

In reply to Cecilia Fernandez

Artificial Intelligence in K12

by Dr. Nellie Deutsch -

Hi Cecilia,

It is wonderful to see how thoughtfully you approach the use of AI in education and instructional design. I especially appreciated your emphasis on the importance of human mediation and careful planning when integrating AI into teaching and learning. Your point about avoiding passive learning experiences is very important because meaningful learning still depends on active student engagement, critical thinking, and the guidance of educators.

Your perspective on AI as a collaborator rather than a replacement for educators also stands out. You explained very clearly how AI can support instructional designers by helping with repetitive tasks and allowing more time for deeper thinking about pedagogy and teaching strategies. This balanced approach reflects a strong understanding of how technology can enhance education when used responsibly and intentionally.

The article you selected is highly relevant to your discussion. I like how you connected the idea of “human in the loop” to your own professional experience and beliefs about teaching and learning. The focus on teacher preparedness, training, and thoughtful implementation is essential, especially as educators continue exploring different ways to use generative AI effectively in K–12 and beyond.

You also raised an important point about the differences in AI adoption among colleagues. Why do you think some educators are still hesitant to explore AI tools in their teaching practice? In your experience as an instructional designer, what kinds of professional development or support help educators feel more confident using AI meaningfully?