Hi Odetty,
Thank you for sharing such a thoughtful and balanced perspective. You clearly see both the opportunities and the responsibilities that come with using AI, and that kind of awareness is exactly what leads to meaningful use in education.
Your point about personalised feedback stands out. When AI is used well, it can meet learners where they are instead of forcing everyone into the same path. That shift from generalised instruction to individual support is powerful, especially in language learning where progress and confidence vary so much from one learner to another. At the same time, you are right to connect this with discipline and understanding plagiarism. AI does not remove responsibility from learners, it actually requires stronger guidance so they learn how to use it ethically and thoughtfully.
Your reflection on course development is also very grounded. AI is not just about saving time, it is about freeing teachers to focus on what matters most, which is designing meaningful learning experiences. When administrative load is reduced, teachers can invest more energy into creativity, interaction, and supporting their students.
It is also very real that some colleagues are hesitant, especially with prompting. This is not a small issue. Writing effective prompts is a skill, and without support, it can feel frustrating. This is where collaboration among teachers becomes important, sharing examples, testing ideas together, and learning through practice rather than expecting perfection right away.
The article you selected fits your thinking very well. What you highlighted from the related work shows a clear limitation of earlier systems, they lacked true personalisation and authentic interaction. Generative AI begins to close that gap by enabling real time communication, adaptive feedback, and flexible content creation. But what I appreciate most in your explanation is that you did not ignore the risks. Bias, privacy, and academic integrity are not side issues, they are central to how AI should be used in education.
Your explanation of the framework and services sections shows a strong understanding of the shift taking place. Learning is moving from something fixed and teacher directed to something more dynamic and learner centred. At the same time, you recognize that teachers remain essential. AI can support, guide, and enhance, but it cannot replace the human role in designing, mentoring, and making ethical decisions.
You are thinking in the right direction. The next step is to keep experimenting in small ways, especially with prompting and activity design, so that both you and your colleagues build confidence through practice rather than theory alone.